Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission.Learn more.

Google’s Fitbit and Samsung collaborations could save Wear OS

June 11, 2025

Wear OSis struggling — there’s just no way around it. Where theApple Watchgrew to 40% of the market at the end of 2020, according toCounterpoint Research, Google-powered smartwatches were mostly lumped into the shrinking “Others” category below brands like Fitbit, Samsung, and HUAWEI. Add insluggish updatesand it’s easy to worry that Wear OS will join Buzz and Wave in the Google Graveyard.

However, Google just turned those expectations on their head with its new collaborations between its recent acquisitionFitbitand mobile giantSamsung. Simply speaking, Google has admitted that Wear OS needs help and is tapping two of the most experienced wearable brands on the planet to help that recovery. They’re both promising unions that could make Wear OS a truly viable competitor in the smartwatch world.

Google IO 2021 Sameer Samat talks wear OS

Fitbit and Samsung will help Google catch up on features

Ask a Wear OS user what they don’t like and you’ll probably hear some familiar refrains. Battery life and performance are frequently acceptable, but mediocre; the built-infitness featuresare lackluster; there aren’t many apps; the interface has largely been stagnant. It’s promising, then, that Google is tapping Fitbit and Samsung for help.

Related:The best Wear OS apps

Fitbit still has a knack for fitness features on watches likethe Senseand yet still is capable of days-long battery life. Meanwhile, Samsung has clarified it will help deliver a brand new, unified experience with better performance and “world-class” health and fitness. That’s saying a lot when Samsung is often thought to have the best smartwatch interface beyond Apple, not to mention longer battery life and a reputation for integrated health features. In other words, Fitbit and Samsung are strong precisely where their new partner is weakest.

And frankly, it’s not clear that Google could have found its way out of its current rut without advice from either Fitbit or Samsung. The company has a long history of half-hearted support for Android on any device that isn’t a phone — justlisten to tablet userswho’ve been waiting years for more than token efforts to improve the interface and app selection. Both new partners may help Google just by breaking bad habits that have run Wear OS into the ground.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 display

Market clout matters

There’s also a basic commercial reality at work: Fitbit and Samsung are bigger, more recognizable names in the wearable world than Google, and in some ways electronics as a whole. Fitbit is almost synonymous with activity trackers, while Samsung dominates in categories ranging from phones to TVs. Even if Fitbit and Samsung didn’t change their product lines, their involvement would give Wear OS credibility it didn’t have even with support from traditional watch brands likeFossilandTAG Heuer.

But they are changing their product lines, and that’s where the partnerships might represent a decisive coup. Fitbit and Samsung have both committed to releasing Wear OS watches in the future, and that should give Google a much-needed hardware boost. Samsung won’t necessarily kill Tizen-based watches as a result, but they may not be as prominent as they once were. And it’s safe to say that Fitbit OS watches won’t be a high priority now that Google is involved (and it could instead make its way to the Google Graveyard in the future).

fitbit sense review apps exercise strava eda scan

Effectively, Google is trying to slide the market share needle by involving some of its erstwhile competitors. There’s no certainty the Fitbit or Samsung watches will lead to a renaissance, but Google might only need a modest success to improve Wear OS’ stature, diminish some of its rivals and convince the public that its technology is worth a second look.

No guarantees of success

Of course, this is all presuming the team-up works as Google hopes. Fitbit may be almost a household name, but there’s no doubt that it isn’t as influential as it once was given its declining sales and a surge of affordable fitness trackersfrom Xiaomiand others. Samsung is still a powerhouse, but it also has its own smartwatch platform and no direct ties to Google. If the Wear OS watch flounders, Samsung might not hesitate to stick to Tizen instead of holding out for Google.

And of course, it’s all in the execution. Fitbit and Samsung may fare better in the smartwatch world than Google has so far, but they’re not flawless. Fitbit’s recent health sensors have been glitchy, for instance, and Samsung hasn’t had much luck fostering a large Galaxy Watch app ecosystem. If either fails to bring its best, Google might not be much better off.

It’s the attempt that matters, though. Google hasn’t shown this kind of commitment to smartwatches since theearly Android Wear days— it’s treating wearable tech as a major project rather than a sideshow. Even if Google, Fitbit and Samsung fail, they’ll have raised hope among fans who otherwise faced a bleak future.

Thank you for being part of our community. Read ourComment Policybefore posting.